Talk:Full-spectrum dominance

Sources

Note: Discussion page has recently been cleared due to a complete lack of appropriate content. Per WP:TALK discussion pages exist to discuss changes and improvements to the article, not as a platform for personal views. Please do not add content inappropriate for Wikipedia's talk pages.

The quote by Harold Pinter is probably not appropriate. He was known for being intensely bitter about US foreign policy. I would bet that in the quote he is applying the military doctrine as if it were a foreign policy doctrine as a means of venting his anger. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.87.1.204 (talk) 23:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Not sure if this counts as a reliable enough source for ya (it's not a blog anyway) but:

http://www.govexec.com/features/1205-01/1205-01s5.htm

to quote -

according to Professor Philip M. Taylor of England's University of Leeds... one of the world's leading experts on psychological operations, public diplomacy and propaganda, and a consultant to the American and British governments... "It's true, though rarely recognized in the control-freakery world of the military, that full spectrum dominance is impossible in the global information environment,"

Suggest edit to reflect reality that full-spectrum dominance is dismissed as credible military doctrine by a respected source. Of course, recognise that the military may disagree, but the point deserves to be made. --Scriblio 23:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Regardless of his credibility, the comment is 14 years old. Technology is not stagnant. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC)