Talk:Fundraiser (The Office)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleFundraiser (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starFundraiser (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 8) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 18, 2012Good article nomineeListed
November 7, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Fundraiser (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 19:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    Quality of article is good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Article complies with MoS.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Sources included where needed.
    C. No original research:  
    No original research found.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
    B. Focused:  
    Article remains focused at all times.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    No bias found.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Article is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Fair-use image is licensed properly and other image is released into the public domain.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Images are provided and appropriate and contain suitable captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Nothing needs to be fixed in this article. Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 19:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fundraiser (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fundraiser (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply