This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
Re hang on: The entry is a description of a a unique and interesting phenomenon in the history of food (as well as psychology and word formation). It is discussed in the authoritative Oxford Companion to Food, and, in the Web site referred to, its absence in Wiki is lamented.
That does not make sense. The "authoritative Oxford Companion to Food" simply cites Bryson; Davidson was clearly tickled by the story and decided to include it. The book is not "authoritative," it is well written and worth having but is very personal and cannot be relied on without checking more scholarly sources. I have altered the wording of the article to reflect the dubious status of all its statements; I personally would vote to delete the article, since it is based on nothing more than the unsupported statement of the notoriously unreliable Bryson. Languagehat (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Removed the notable warning. Added additional references including the original US military source. Mindme (talk)
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am not a linguist, but there is no way that the these two terms are phonetically similar. In fuoristrada the "U" is a semivowel (similar to the "W" in "women"), but the "U" in funistrada is a vowel (same as the sound in "food"). To me - Italian native speaker, funi- makes me think of a string (fune), or, to be generous, of the famous song "funiculi-funicula".
207.112.62.181 (talk) 04:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply