This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
A fact from Furietti Centaurs appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 June 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
These are the Furietti Centaurs: dividing them into two articles, under obscure names has no defensible rationale. They were conceived as a pair, perhaps both ridden by cupids and illustrating the pleasures and frustrations of love, in youth and in maturity. How can they be considered separately? --Wetman16:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well, the Louvre one is only highly likely to have once had a (now-lost) pair, not certain, but I take your point and will instigate a merger, and then can you add something about Furietti? I hadn't heard of him til now, and whenever they're referred to separately in UK museums (eg the label for the casts of them at the Courtauld) or academe, "Old Centaur" and "Young Centaur" are the commonly accepted titles, nothing obscure about it. Neddyseagoon - talk16:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In this sentence here it says that Napoleon "acquired" this:
"It entered the Borghese collection, but was acquired from Camillo Filippo Ludovico Borghese by Napoleon in 1807 and is now in the Louvre Museum"
Why is this word "acquired" used when it has been well established that the French simply stole and plundered Italian art. After all what is the difference between the Nazis plundering gold and the French plundering art? For more info see this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tolentino
With this in mind this sentence would be more accurately written as the following,
"It entered the Borghese collection, but was plundered from Camillo Filippo Ludovico Borghese by Napoleon in 1807 and is now in the Louvre Museum" with other plundered Italian art. T.Nuvolari (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
