Talk:Gödel (programming language)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

The article is biased

edit

The article includes citations from the book, and it is not neutral. --Elaz85 (talk) 19:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Searching the GBooks version of The Gödel Programming Language for some random phrases shows that large parts of the article were copied verbatim from that book in Special:Diff/553957042. It's sad that this situation has endured for almost two years. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
I didn't think the article seemed biased but if its plagiarized, especially from a copyrighted book, I'm pretty sure it violates Wikipedia policy and we should either rewrite it or report it at wp:Plagiarism_problems I don't know anything about the Godel language so I'm probably not the right person to rewrite it but if no one can rewrite it I'll at least report it. Do you have the specific phrases to search for or the page numbers of plagiarized text? --MadScientistX11 (talk) 00:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gödel (programming language). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply