Talk:G. Flint Taylor
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NPOV tag discussion
editHello - I am the author of this article. Could an experienced editor please let me know what needs to be changed in order to satisfy concerns about neutrality? I'm confused why a flag was added, as it contains no specifics. Thanks in advance, Carolfowler1 (talk) 20:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Carolfowler1
- The article is very one-sided about the merits of the cases G. Flint Taylor was fighting for. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Graeme Bartlett. The sources for the information about Taylor are a mix of news articles, legal journals and court documents. Being a resident of Chicago and a journalist, I'm familiar with the high profile cases that Taylor took part in and believe this to be an even-handed treatment. That said, I respectfully ask what changes you might suggest in order to bring the article into compliance with Wikipedia standards. Carolfowler1 (talk) 22:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Carolfowler1
- The merits of a case are decided by the courts. And, in the cases listed in this article, it was the courts that decided Taylor's side had merit. I think the coverage here is pretty even-handed. Fearofreprisal (talk) 16:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on G. Flint Taylor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141003045302/http://politics.suntimes.com:80/article/chicago/burge-victims-renew-their-pitch-20-million-reparations/thu-10022014-1135am to http://politics.suntimes.com/article/chicago/burge-victims-renew-their-pitch-20-million-reparations/thu-10022014-1135am
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://chitowndailynews.org/2007/07/24/Critics-blast-torture-investigation-9541.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)