Talk:GCompris
Untitled discussion
editGcompris requires 20$ for registration to unlock most of the program features... It is not correct to classify this software as free or include in free software portal. 88.249.208.188 10:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- As far as I know, only the Windows version is crippled[1] (which the article notes in the intro). The Linux version is free (as in free beer). Since the source code is available as well, it classifies as "free software". Free software != freeware. utcursch | talk 11:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry to resurrect an old issue, but the first discusser was actually right. It doesn't matter that the code is available for GNU/Linux, if you cannot get access to it just because you use Windows, the program is not free as in freedom. Freedom 0 is "The freedom to run the program, for any purpose". --–w2bh talk•contribs 14:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- You are free to download the source code and compile it yourself for Windows (although you would probably want to remove the code prompting for a key). However, many users will choose not to do so because compiling the software for Windows is likely to be more involved than GNU/Linux. This was discussed briefly on the fsf-community-team mailing list in June 2012 (the archives are private, but you can view them if you sign up for the list). Mikegerwitz (talk) 14:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry to resurrect an old issue, but the first discusser was actually right. It doesn't matter that the code is available for GNU/Linux, if you cannot get access to it just because you use Windows, the program is not free as in freedom. Freedom 0 is "The freedom to run the program, for any purpose". --–w2bh talk•contribs 14:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
J'ai Compris
editJ'ai compris does not mean 'I understand'. It is in the past tense and means 'I have understood'. 90.10.145.43 16:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Andy
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on GCompris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808160630/http://www.expresscomputeronline.com:80/20031006/indiacomputes02.shtml to http://www.expresscomputeronline.com/20031006/indiacomputes02.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)