Talk:GDDR4 SDRAM

Adoption

Someone needs to update the adoption section. It references something in july 2006.128.95.141.33 (talk) 03:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey, i was wondering why DDR4 redirects to this, since GDDR and DDR are two similar but different things?

Shouldn't there be a placeholder article for DDR4, which seeing as DDR3 is becoming available, should be no more than 3 years away? Talrinys 21:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Unreliable sources

The citation to "The Inquirer" is bad. The Inquirer is known as a rumormongering site that is almost always incorrect. Looking at the cited article alone shows how incorrect it is, althoug that is with Hindsight bias. But truth be told, all the assertions in the article are incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.28.228.112 (talk) 19:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Synchronous dynamic random-access memory which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)