Talk:GEO Group/Archive 2

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Niteshift36 in topic Sources
Archive 1Archive 2

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GEO Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Sources

https://slideblast.com/mar-2-0-2012-southern-poverty-law-center_5a0a9d961723ddd0450930aa.html

https://www.npr.org/2012/04/24/151276620/firm-leaves-miss-after-its-prison-is-called-cesspool

(((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 23:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

And what are these being used to source? Niteshift36 (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
I should've been more clear; I mean that they probably can be used as sources, not that they already are. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Maybe I should have been more clear myself. What do either of these sources bring to the article that isn't here and needs to be in this article, not in the article about Walnut Grove? Niteshift36 (talk) 16:56, 8 January 2018 (UTC)