 | GE E60 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 12, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from GE E60 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 August 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stub this?
editThis entire article is effectively unsourced; I don't think the way to solve this is to add more unsourced information. I'm tempted to take Sturmovik (talk · contribs) up on his suggestion to stub the article and start over. I can't get them immediately but I have some books with discussion of the E60, suitable for starting over. Any takers? Mackensen (talk) 14:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- FWIW, the reason I removed the information added by Sturmovik (talk · contribs) just to force him to add the reference to his "GE Manual". It was bizarre that information be added, for which a reference source was known. I felt it was a lazy edit, and just wanted the reference to be added. I'm comfortable with the rest of the article being unreferenced, but I have a new year resolution to try and ensure that where information is added, that it is correctly sourced. Call it a "drawing a line in the sand" ... accept the past, but do not accept past behaviors as being acceptable in the future.KirksKeyKard (talk) 15:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Instead of deleting things try the talk page. I couldn't find an obvious reference template for manuals, but now I don't care. BTW I was of half a mind to tear this whole article down to a stub just to give you a taste of your own medicine. Pro tip, being obstructionist is not a very positive new year's resolution.Sturmovik (talk) 18:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- You've complied with my request, which was un-necessary in the first place. A seasoned editor should not need to be reminded of one of the five pillars. i.e. "All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative sources." KirksKeyKard (talk) 19:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Instead of deleting things try the talk page. I couldn't find an obvious reference template for manuals, but now I don't care. BTW I was of half a mind to tear this whole article down to a stub just to give you a taste of your own medicine. Pro tip, being obstructionist is not a very positive new year's resolution.Sturmovik (talk) 18:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyright problem
editMuch of the section on the E60C-2 appears to be plagiarized from the following source: Geissenheimer, Harold (March 9, 2002). "Rail Commentary". The New New Electric Railway Journal. Archived from the original on August 12, 2004. Retrieved August 7, 2016. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help) Here's the duplicator detector report. It's been in the article from the beginning. Mackensen (talk) 22:13, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- I did the original work 10 years ago. After reviewing the page, I did cite Geissenheimer's article in 2002 as a source for NdeM's E60C-2 order. If it is deemed as plagiarization, I apologize for that and you can remove this portion if you want. Chaohwa (talk) 19:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- This is resolved; I rewrote it, then removed it altogether. Mackensen (talk) 18:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on GE E60. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160202093917/http://gg1bob.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=4392013 to http://gg1bob.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=4392013
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060222145707/http://www.trolleycar.org:80/observations/geissenheimer/geissenheimer020226.htm to http://www.trolleycar.org/observations/geissenheimer/geissenheimer020226.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060701013811/http://www.hebners.net:80/amtrak/ to http://hebners.net/amtrak/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
New Jersey Transit
editI'm having a hard time finding anything on the New Jersey Transit ownership of these locomotives beyond the newspaper articles on their purchase from Amtrak in 1983. NJT isn't my usual beat; I'm open to suggestions. Mackensen (talk) 23:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)