Talk:GNU Interpreter for Java
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 April 2018. The result of the discussion was merge. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Java Virtual Machine
edit- The GNU Interpreter for Java (GIJ) is a Java bytecode interpreter for the Java programming language.
So is GIJ an implementation of the Java Virtual Machine specification? And why does this statement have the constraint "for the Java programming language"? If GIJ interprets Java bytecode, it should run such bytecode derived from any programming language (e.g. Scala), not only Java. --Abdull (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- There does not seem to be any reference to any restriction to the Java programming language according to the GCJ manual. I am correcting the article accordingly. --Joshua Issac (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on GNU Interpreter for Java. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509055923/http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ to https://gcc.gnu.org/java/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)