Talk:GPS Air

Latest comment: 1 year ago by RoySmith in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk16:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self-nominated at 02:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   @Silver seren: Good article! Hook is interesting, QPQ is done, and the article is sourced.   Approving. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Silver seren and Onegreatjoke, i believe the proposed hook, as it stands, states that the lawsuit was filed against the air purification devices rather than the company. would the following rewording be more accurate?
also, did the lawsuit actually state that the devices were potentially harmful? i admittedly could not find this explicitly mentioned in the source provided. dying (talk) 09:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Dying: I removed the commas in your alt, but otherwise, I'm fine with it being used as a replacement. I agree that yours is more straightforward. As for the lawsuit, yes, as the law group filing the class action also note over here. SilverserenC 00:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Silver seren, thanks for the additional source. admittedly, i couldn't figure out where that source mentions that the lawsuit stated that the devices were potentially harmful, but it helped me find this pdf file, which appears to be the complaint itself. it asserts that the devices produce harmful volatile organic compounds, which is close enough to "were potentially harmful" for me. also, i was torn over whether the hook read better with or without the commas, so have no issues with their omission. by the way, thanks for adding the bold formatting that i had forgotten to include.
Onegreatjoke, does alt0b look okay to you? dying (talk) 05:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply