Talk:GU Comics

Single video game???

Whats with the plethora of WoW comics? Im quite sick of WoW and graduated to better games now. Please try to do something else, WoW is for immature kiddies and not everyone who read your comics are 12 years old.

So you honestly think all 11 million World of Warcraft players are immature and 12 years old? Seriously, grow up, and learn to sign your posts, please. 78.70.249.253 (talk) 21:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

NPOV

The following section

Jack Thompson Controversy- GU Comics has, along with many other webcomics, on many occassions taken on anti-videogame campaigner and lawyer Jack Thompson through a combination of parodies in several comics, and raising awareness within the gaming community of the activities of Mr. Thompson.

seems to lack a NPOV concerning Jack Thompson. While I personally hold no love for the guy, the phrase "raising awareness" has a POV feel to it. To almost seems akin to "raising awareness" for HIV/AIDS or the like. Mikemill 22:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I changed it to say

GU Comics has, along with many other webcomics, on several occasions taken on lawyer Jack Thompson, known for his activism against violent video games, through a combination of parodies in several comics, and letting the gaming community know about the activities of Mr. Thompson.

I hope this is better. Minirogue 00:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

That works. I am not used to writing in an NPOV style, too against my nature I guess, so no worries--Breandán 02:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Recommend monitoring for vandalism, NPOV statements as to the person WHearn, if source-able should be made into a sub of the article. However they need to meet the criteria worth being part of wikipedia. wageit

Vandal Edits

This issue, for intents and purposes has been "resolved". If you would like to discuss it futher please use another form of communication to address it with me personally. Whearn 17:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Uhh...I'm not too sure since I am still kind of a noob at the whole Wikipedia thing, but I'm not sure you are supposed to delete an entire talk topic like that...but I have no problem with it personally. Just letting you know in case you get scolded by someone more experienced or something. Minirogue 19:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

as the person who was subject to derogatory remarks from my supposed friend regarding myself being vapid etc and was extremlley annoyed by the whole incident with my half wit of a flatmate to the degree I have now left the GU site where i have been happy for years I am quite pleased he has removed this minirogue so no issues from the other adult side of the conversation.

If this is viewed by a moderator and they are worried the other parties are annoyed let me add that I am quite pleased that this has been taken down.

As W Hearn is the owner of the GU site and I was the party who had been "possibly" implicated for the half wit who lives in the same houses actions I am quite happy this has been taken down and have no issues.82.30.252.45 20:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GU Comics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070115224909/http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/community/communitylinks.html to http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/community/communitylinks.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)