Talk:GU Energy Labs/Archive 1

Archive 1

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 15:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move. The article page had already been moved before this discussion opened, so I have moved the talk page to match. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:53, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

---

GU (food) → GU Energy Labs – to match the current article name, after a few cycles of redirects, where this new talk page name already exists, was previously a redirect to here. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

• Support. Thank you for submitting this request. To be clear, I think this only applies to the talk page, as the article itself has already been moved and expanded. --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

COI

Extended content

In accordance with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, I have chosen to disclose that I have a personal connection to this subject. I will spare details, but my main purpose in writing this article is to benefit Wikipedia and its mission. I believe this article is written from a neutral perspective and has been constructed from independent, reliable sources. (There are some references from GU's official website, but mostly just to verify products and the company's history.) The second link above provides the following summary, which I believe I have followed appropriately: Be transparent about your conflict of interest ( Done) Subjects require significant coverage in independent reliable sources. ( Done) Your role is to inform and reference, not promote or sell. ( Doing...) Be extremely cautious about the risks of editing articles about yourself or your clients ( Done|N/A) If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject. ( Doing...) State facts and statistics, don't be vague or general. ( Doing...) Take time to get sources and policy right. ( Doing...) Get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review your draft. ( Doing...) Work with the community and we'll work with you. ( Doing...) Communicate, communicate, communicate. ( Doing...)

I invite all to examine this article carefully to make sure the content is fair and accurate. Feel free to contact me if you have any concerns. Thank you. --Another Believer _(Talk) 17:02, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

I have submitted a request for a copy edit by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors. --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

The copy edit is complete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

I agree with, and appreciate, the changes that were made to the article during the copy edit review. I'm now nominating the article for GA status. --Another Believer _(Talk) 03:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)