Talk:Gadsden Mall

Prod removal

The prod was removed on the basis that "this is a regional mall with more than 500,000 square feet of retail space". Apparently, by being 503,000 feet, it meets that editor's standard. I was unaware that that was our guideline -- most such malls of under 1 million square feet, I have been told, have the usual outcome of it being agreed that they do not warrant a stand-alone article. Where might I find the above-indicated approach supported? Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I've handed a selection of article from reliable sources to improve verifiability and meet the notability thresholds. This article could be expanded significantly by a motivated editor using these sources. - Dravecky (talk) 07:37, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. That's great. Beautiful work. Any thoughts as to my questions?--Epeefleche (talk) 08:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

As I indicated in the other thread, that's been my experience when US shopping mall articles are taken to AfD. These are regional malls, the only or primary enclosed shopping center in a large geographical area, garnering significant ongoing attention from the news media. Even if coverage were to wane or cease (or the mall shut down), notability is not temporary. - Dravecky (talk) 09:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gadsden Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110809102624/http://preit.com/leasing/detail/plans/37 to http://www.preit.com/leasing/detail/plans/37

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)