Talk:Gadsden Purchase half dollar
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Wehwalt in topic Bicentennial quarter vs. None from 1955 to 1981
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gadsden Purchase half dollar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Gadsden Purchase half dollar is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 9, 2019. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Bicentennial quarter vs. None from 1955 to 1981
editAccording to the article, "No commemorative coins were struck from 1955 until after the Treasury Department changed its position in 1981." However, the page for commemorative coins pictures the bicentennial quarter which was issued in 1976. I don't know enough about coins to fix this, but the two pages contradict each other.
- It is a circulating commemorative, which is not considered part of the commemorative coin series, but part of the series of Washington quarter and so forth.--Wehwalt (talk) 05:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Error
editWhat should be done about the "Check date values in: |date=" error displayed near the bottom of the article? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I don't plan to do anything. The information is correct, it's just a question of formatting, something that does not affect the reader. I could remove the 10, but that would cost the reader information.--Wehwalt (talk) 05:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)