Talk:Galantamine total synthesis
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Does this subject deserve so much space on Wikipedia? A few references would do. Could easily be incorporated in the article on glalantamine, with those few references. Except for very, very few biochemists, who cares? Mwinog2777 05:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- My comment is on my userpage V8rik 16:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- I am far from being a chemist nor a biochemist, but I find this a curious article and it is not getting in the way of anything else. It might be written on a simpler level, but I would think that the folks who would ever consider reading it would find the jargon acceptable. It is far from slanderous or damaging and the background might be helpful for those who need examples of total synthesis (whoever they may be). --Chrispounds 15:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Galantamine total synthesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722112158/http://www.heterocycles.jp/library/abstract.php?article=14848 to http://www.heterocycles.jp/library/abstract.php?article=14848
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)