Talk:Galerie Chalette

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Galerie Chalette article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Proposed merge of Draft:Galerie Chalette into Galerie Chalette

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The draft and the article need to be compared so that all information is in the article.

Also, the article appears to have been copied from the draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Note: the current version is the result of a discussion between the original drafter Sicklemoon and Jpbowen. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Robert and Jonathan--I am both pleased and interested to see the changes Jonathan made to my orginal piece. It is great to see the information up, and reformated/reconstructed to better conform to the Wikipedia model. Jonathan had offered to do this for me to the end of creating a teaching piece for me. It is fascinating to see the changes--so much faster to learn this way than to sit back and wonder what the important/necessary changes would be. Also useful was the addition of the "citations needed."

I'm going to let this sit for a bit--and perhaps track down those citations. I hope there is no issue with how this worked out. I am learning my way around Wikipedia, and am frankly more vested in improving the scope and accuracy of 20th c art topics than about controlling any single adjective or factoid. Thank you both for looking over this piece and seeing it shepherded through. Much appreciated, and I'm looking forward to moving on to my next topic. All best, Katya Sicklemoon (talk)

Add topic