Talk:Galileo GDS

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

I removed all of the following as it is inaccurate and not relevent to this article. It could be incorporated into the code share article.


(quote)

In Global Distribution Systems, such as Amadeus, Galileo, Worldspan, or Sabre, code sharing results in the same flight details, except for the flight number, being displayed on computer screens excessively forcing other airlines flights to be displayed on following pages where they may be missed by passengers searching for required flights.

Much competition in the airline industry revolves around ticket sales (also known as "seat booking") strategies. Travel agents have a preference for flights which provide a direct connection. Code sharing gives this impression. Computer reservations systems (CRS) also often do not discriminate between direct flights and code sharing flights and present both before options that involve several isolate stretches run by different companies.

Criticism has been levelled against code sharing by consumer organizations and national departments of trade since it is claimed it is confusing and not transparent to passengers, but thus far without any success.


(End quote)


Galileo does not treat code shares any differently to other CRS. They are obvious to the agent booking, as there is a small marker in front of the flight number that indicates a code share. Unless specifically requested, non-stop flights will show up first, so the writers claim that this pushes suitable flights to later screens is inaccurate.


--Dmol 10:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Galileo is now owned by Travelport

edit

Information on Galileo ownership is no longer up to date. Cendant has split-off their Travel Distribution Services (Cendant TDS), re-named it Travelport. Recently Travelport was acquired by private equity company Blackstone.


history

edit

I added a history section to explain the context of CRS. This was a very hot topic in the late 1980's. Industry publications, such as Aviation Week, covered it possibly every other week. The youngster who doesn't know history well could easily not understand the battles of that era, like the CRS one. This is understandable but I seek to remedy that partially with the history section. It's just a start and could be improved. Archtransit 15:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Worldspan is now also owned by Travelport for over a year, after the acquisition by Blackstone of Travelport. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.235.147 (talk) 00:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians, They are crazy and do not know any thing I have just modified one external link on Galileo GDS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Galileo GDS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply