Talk:Gallet & Company

COI

I assume this was written by the subject of the article? Rees11 (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

This article was not written by the subject of the article. I am not affiliated with the subject in any professional capacity, and have never received any sort of compensation from the subject except for a thank you for the donation of my personally authored works and images for use on both Wikipedia and the subject’s website. For over 30 years, I have been an amateur timekeeping historian, even though my words and images have been copied and utilized in numerous publications, both in print and on the web. The assumption that I am closely affiliated with the subject of the article is understandable due to my unusual level of knowledge and enthusiasm with the subject, and I greatly appreciate the concerns of others for maintaining the quality and integrity of Wikipedia. With this said, I wish to have the COI and advert tags removed from this article. Time Maven (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, but I hope you see that it did look suspicious. I'd like to reduce a bit more of the promotional language then we can remove the advert tag too. Rees11 (talk) 20:13, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

I understand. Over the next few days I will be adding some additional citations and references, so I will also work on reducing the promotional language. Your input has helped to improve the overall quality of the article and taught me a few things. For this, I am grateful. Time Maven (talk) 20:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Philippe gallet geneva registry jewelers watchmakers.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Philippe gallet geneva registry jewelers watchmakers.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gallet & Co.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100126175844/http://www.nawcc.org/index.php/museumlibrary to http://nawcc.org/index.php/museumlibrary

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 10 October 2017 (UTC)