Talk:Gambit in other media

Merge to Gambit artiicle?

Shouldn't this be merged to actuaal Gambit article

Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2

Can we please stop having guesses, hopes and dreams of the character being in Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2 being added to the article?

So far we've had:

• "Gambit has apeared (sic) on a variation of the box art for Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2."

This is all well an good, but it's very, very trivial. Not Every case of Marvel using the character, or allowing the character to be used, to sell something falls under this subject.

• "Gambit will most likely be playable in Marvel: Ultimate Alliance 2 as he appears with other playable characters on the video game's cover."

Is pure assumption. This is stating "We, the editors, here think that Gambit will not only be a character in the game but also a playable one solely because the Gambit is picture with other characters in the box art. And some of those characters we some how know are playable characters in the game."

We don't get to guess or assume. We need a reliable, verifiable secondary source.

• "In Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2 Gambit appears but is not been Anounced (sic) as playable or not."

Is awkward, unsourced trivia.

Before material on Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2 is added back in, please make sure that:

1. It has a reliable source to back it up.
2. Isn't pure trivia.
3. Doesn't include personal or fan speculation.
4. Doesn't include "non-information" - And something like "No announcement about the character being playable or not" is non-information.

Thanks,

- J Greb (talk) 16:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

<re: "Is awkward, unsourced trivia.">

IT IS NOT, HE IS ON THE COVER! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.244.132.93 (talk) 19:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

And depicting the character in the promotional box art is trivial, I'm sorry. It's also not a guarantee that the character is in the game in any form - or that he'll stay in the art for the final release. - J Greb (talk) 20:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gambit in other media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100225195008/http://homepage.mac.com:80/phillamarr/Personal4.html to http://homepage.mac.com/phillamarr/Personal4.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071201062254/http://www.mania.com:80/38444.html to http://www.mania.com/38444.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://screenrant.com/magic-mike-xxl-reid-carolin-ininterview
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://heoichollywood.com/home-1/2015/10/22/the-top-3-contenders-to-direct-gambit

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)