Talk:Game On (The West Wing)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination

Requested move 11 September 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per consensus. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


Game On (The West Wing episode)Game On (The West Wing) – Draftified, but now I want to move back to the original theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 22:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk09:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Reviewed: Anthony Ciulla, Karl-Heinz Petzinka
  • Comment: This article has jumped through a few moves, but it was expanded from a redirect yesterday.
  • Second comment: While ALT0 is a good hook, ALT1 is the only one that includes the second nominated article, so—it should probably be the one considered.

Converted from a redirect by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 22:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC).Reply

  •   Looks great on both. The new page in particular is a nice write! Both articles clearly pass newness/length/neutral/cites and are well-composed. QPQ good. Lots of hits on Earwig but that's because of cited quotation discussed in the text. No close paraphasing or copyvios. This is a nice, punchy, tight and intriguing double DYK. Am I missing something? BusterD (talk) 23:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
T:DYK/P7