Talk:Gampi

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

History of page

edit

In the course of today:

  1. I renamed Gampi to Wikstroemia retusa, following a statement on what was then Talk:Gampi. (This leaving Gampi as a redirect to Wikstroemia retusa).
  2. I then explored further, found several other systematic names associated with "Gampi" or "Ganpi", and expanded the article.
  3. I asked for help at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants#Gampi
  4. User:Lavateraguy weighed in with helpful taxonomical expertise and upgraded the article substantially
  5. I decided that Gampi should be more than a redirect to W. retusa, and copied the content from an earlier version to re-create the article on the paper-making fibre, at Gampi. I'm about to cleanup/expand it on those lines, and will remove irrelevant stuff from Wikstroemia retusa.

I'll leave this note on both pages. PamD 16:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gampi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply