Talk:Ganas
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ganas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
 | Ganas was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Flyswatting again
editReverted to 439914645 revision, Flyswatting's repetitive changes after SilkTork's intervention is disruptive and not an improvement with the exception of the first paragraph which I left intact. Flyswatting and assorted socks please stop sabotaging this page. Eroberer (talk) 15:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- I could say the same thing about you. --Flyswatting (talk) 06:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
New York Post? Seriously?
editThe New York Post is well-known for being a sensationalist tabloid and has been involved in numerous controversies regarding their reporting. Just look at Wikipedia's own article on the publication: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Post. IMO, this is in no way a reliable enough source of reference for a Wikipedia article. I have removed three sentences that exclusively use The New York Post as a reference, and removed it as one of the references in another sentence. Also changed "several" to "at least two" in "Controversies" section, as it is a more specific number and there were only two ex-members in the references cited that made the specified allegations (see: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words) -SunshineChap 2/9/2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.216.227.186 (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- I suspect it is a reliable source for the revised sentence in the lead. dm (talk) 18:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ganas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080227041205/http://activistsolutions.org/about/who_we_are/mildred_gordon to http://activistsolutions.org/about/who_we_are/mildred_gordon
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Jeff Gross returned to New York?
editStanfordMITPhd Hi, I have very little experience editing and I hope I'm not committing a faux pas here. Am I reading the history correctly that you added that the Esquire magazine says Jeff Gross moved back to New York? I don't think that is true, and I cannot find that in the article. Can you point me to that? Thank you for your time. 108.29.219.186 (talk) 22:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. Thanks for noting. Made the change. StanfordMITPhd (talk) 12:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)