Talk:Ganja International Airport
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ganja International Airport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge Proposal
editI believe Ganja Air Base, a stub article, should be merged into Ganja Airport. - Canglesea (talk) 14:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ganja International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002120524/https://charts.aero/airport/UBBG to https://charts.aero/airport/UBBG
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150415045956/http://www.azal.az/en/information/flight-timetables to http://www.azal.az/en/information/flight-timetables
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Edit protection needed
editThis page is currently subject to persistent vandalism with no sourced or propaganda material. It needs to be reverted and protected until more reliable sources report on the situation.128.72.209.27 (talk) 09:48, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Presence of Turkish F-16s related to the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
editIt would appear that the presence of at least two Turkish Air Force F-16s is related to the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and not (just) a military exercise in August. Quoting from The War Zone:
That exercise, dubbed TurAz Qartali-2020, was supposed to wrap up on Aug. 10. However, additional imagery from Planet Labs shows six F-16s, as well as what looks to be a CN-235, still on the ramp at Ganja on Sept. 10. Lower-resolution imagery available in Planet Labs archives dated between August 10th, through Sept. 10th, and on to Oct. 3rd shows the persistent presence of what look to be combat jets in the same portion of the same area of the airport.
See also the relevant thread from New York Times visual investigator Christiaan Triebert: https://twitter.com/trbrtc/status/1313903827435892737
PvOberstein (talk) 21:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Twitter is not RS. Beshogur (talk) 21:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Beshogur: As Template:Cite tweet reads "Tweets and other self-published material may be acceptable if the conditions specified at WP:SPS or WP:TWITTER are met." The tweets are from the verified account of Mr. Christiaan Triebert, who is a journalist at The New York Times, and the tweets are related to his professional work. In this context, I believe that they constitute a reliable source. PvOberstein (talk) 21:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but why would you need tw source if there is already present? Beshogur (talk) 21:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- I agree that it is not strictly necessary, but Mr. Triebert's tweets were the original sources of much of the information being circulated in various news articles, and contain some details that are not found in the more formally-published articles. Respectfully, I would like to reinstate the Twitter source, as it is a good complement to the War Drive article. PvOberstein (talk) 22:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but why would you need tw source if there is already present? Beshogur (talk) 21:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Beshogur: As Template:Cite tweet reads "Tweets and other self-published material may be acceptable if the conditions specified at WP:SPS or WP:TWITTER are met." The tweets are from the verified account of Mr. Christiaan Triebert, who is a journalist at The New York Times, and the tweets are related to his professional work. In this context, I believe that they constitute a reliable source. PvOberstein (talk) 21:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)