Talk:Gardein

Latest comment: 7 years ago by SunnyBoi in topic Images in article
Former good articleGardein was one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 10, 2017Good article nomineeListed
July 1, 2021Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

edit

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 09:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

sodium level

edit

I edited the article to add the amount of sodium contained in a typical Gardein product. As the article stands, it reads like marketing literature from Gardein, and I wanted to give it a more neutral tone. Furthermore, the high amount of sodium in Gardein products is not a trivial matter. Is there a good reason why the paragraph on the sodium level in Gardein products was deleted? Mark356 (talk) 08:08, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

A post to my talk page about this article

edit

Hi, edit this as you may as I'm unsure of where exactly I should write this. You recently reverted a change I made to the Gardein Wikipedia page. While we appreciate your input, the change was made by a Gardein representative as this verbiage is not in line with our branding. I am going to remake the initial change and we would appreciate it if you would kindly keep it as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eigthsense (talkcontribs) 00:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

wow. this is totally bizarre that someone thinks the business of a wikipedia page is to fall into line with someone's idea of product branding, as if they own control of the wikipedia article. the fact this page contains zero information about the actual manufacturing process, but a big list of awards, gives you some idea of how urgently this page needs to be reduced to a stub, and these disputes need to be referred upwards to arbitration — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.175.57.184 (talk) 06:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gardein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

What are these things made of? Article reads like ad

edit

This article reads like an advertisement/promotion for Gardein. Establish a description of what the product is, and less on branding the varieties of Gardein products. WinterSpw (talk) 20:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removal of "issues" banner alert

edit

Hi, I removed the COI/advertorial banner after making changes to the article. I added product ingredients/process, company history, and added citations for the awards. Sorry, I should also add that for balance, I looked for any food recalls or contamination, but was not able to locate any sources. I read the guidelines for removing the banner alert, but if this was incorrect, I understand if the banner needs to be re-added. Thank you! SunnyBoi (talk) 12:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC) SunnyBoi (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Images in article

edit

Hello, the images were previously uploaded to the article, I'm unsure of the best way to address this or if I should just remove them? (they were noted in the article review). Thank you so much! SunnyBoi (talk) 08:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply