Talk:Garland Rivers

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleGarland Rivers has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 26, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 10, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Garland Rivers was the only true freshman to earn a varsity letter on the 1983 Michigan Wolverines football team?

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)

Short, but very well written.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    There could be a little more detail.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    It could be a little more neutral in places.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    One image is non-free, but has a rationale. It could be replaced with a free one, a photo at a game?
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Well done for this, carry on improving! WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 21:13, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Photo correct?

edit

@AccountabilityGroup: A reader has questioned whether the current photographs in the article is actually a photo of Garland Rivers.

That person notes the existence of other photographs of Garland rivers on the Internet such as the following:

site with photo of Garland Rivers

However, the photographs are separated in time by over 25 years, so I cannot be sure whether they are or are not the same person.

Can anyone shed any light on this?--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Garland Rivers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Garland Rivers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)Reply