Talk:Garland grenade
Latest comment: 3 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Garland grenade appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the original version of the First World War Garland grenade was made from a food tin packed with barbed wire and spent bullets? "A man named Garland from the Cairo arsenal made improvised bombs from food tins filled with bits of barbed wire and spent Turkish bullets, gunpowder or some kind of explosive detonator, and a fuse wire." from: "Bimbashi Garland". Priaulx Library. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 11:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC).
New article that was moved to mainspace on 2 February 2021 is 2,772 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected [1] and duplication detector [2][3][4] reveal no close paraphrasing issues (AGF books and offline refs which can't go through Dup detector). Article are well-sourced. Hook is 132 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Ref 2 (verifying the hook) is a reliable source. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 03:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
