Talk:Garlic bread
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Garlic bread article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
editThis article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 10:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Development of forzen garlic bread
editIf a neutral citation can be given, I shall remove the reference to the company. The idea that any one company can lay claim to being the first in the world to do something so simple is a bit dubious. Mtaylor848 (talk) 16:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Garlic Bread
Garlic...and...bread? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.126.11 (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Cult Following
editHey, y'all! I didn't want to make this edit because I'm not good with larger edits and it felt too informal (although I may be wrong), so I'll run it through with y'all. Should we make a section on the page about garlic bread's cult following? While it may be slightly too "much" for the page, too little information to report anything on, and isn't the largest cult following, I'd still find it interesting if the section was added. I'm pretty sure there is a small Instagram page, a medium-size subreddit, and also a Tik Tok account (although I'm not sure if it was named that just as a joke), to start off with good places to research. To restate my question, should the cult following section be made or ignored due to bad reasoning? Thanks in advance,
Presumptuous nonsense
editGarlic bread can not be found in Italy, as Italian cuisine uses garlic parsimoniously and the bread at the table is usually eaten plain.
You can find garlic bread everywhere in Italy. Citation to this silly claim, please. Valgrus Thunderaxe (talk) 12:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- It really is worded like bringing garlic and bread together is physically impossible there, even when it's stated 2 lines before that it's "an Italian-American dish". No idea why.
- Unfortunately, I have no idea what a good source for what Italians do with garlic bread would be. The ones I found only really state that it's not too popular there, that Italians are more concerned with bruschetta, or that it "doesn't exist in real Italian cuisine". Maybe that's what the original writer meant to say, but just didn't word it properly. cogsan (talk) 13:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
the removal of the culture references
editIn my opinion the culture references should be readded as they help to fill this rather short article with some helpful infos and I don't see any advantage of removing correct and helpful information, which already has been written. ApfelkuchenFisch (talk) 08:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, @ApfelkuchenFisch! I don't see how any of those actually add to the reader's understanding of the article subject, and most of them had no references. Valereee (talk) 19:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)