Talk:Gary Clark Jr.

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

nominated for neutrality check

edit

Added template for neutrality check -- article reads like a promotional piece MinervaK (talk) 04:01, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Some random ISP removed template 02 Nov 2011. I've undone the removal, please let me know if the page has, in fact, been checked for POV and passed. Thanks -- MinervaK (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

This page is currently reading like promotional copy. Guidedbyalan (talk) 11:21, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Agreed about neutrality, particularly the statement about being the "savior of the blues". Firstly we have to realize there is a lot of hype about this young man and his Bright Lights EP right noFw. He will have to accomplish a lot more to earn that kind of statement. Second, the first citation to that statement is a paragraph only and it's logic is questionable IMHO. The second citation only claims he is the future of 'texas blues'. I want to tone down the statement, maybe state he has been referred to as the future of texas blues. does anyone object? Zatoichi26 (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
BTW I state the above as a fan, but let's not rush to crowning him the next SRV or Hendrix quite yet. Zatoichi26 (talk) 00:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Some time has passed since I wrote the above, and I see the statement in question was edited, however it still bothers me and I've changed it from "savior of blues" to "future of Texas blues". The reasons are 1) one of the citations which I have now removed, http://www.studio360.org/2011/mar/25/gary-clark-jr-saves-blues/, only mentioned "saving the blues" in the title, not in the body of the article; 2) anyone who is a blues fan today would be surprised to know that blues needs saving, and knows that blues has many thriving contemporary artists; 3) the citation which remains says he is the "future of Texas blues" and nothing about him being the savior of blues. 4) I removed the aforementioned citation because it's really a silly article, see my point #2, and also the article presupposes that a lack of black artists has resulted in the blues needing "saving" even though there are many contemporary black blues artists today, and the article itself admits that Stevie Ray Vaughn and his brother, who were/are white, "defined modern blues". The article contradicts itself and is not, in my opinion, of a quality that should be referenced on Wikipedia. Hope that makes sense to everyone. Thanks. Zatoichi26 (talk) 01:50, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

How does Gary Clark, Jr. have 6 members, only one of whom is actually Gary Clark, Jr.? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.1.1.1 (talk) 22:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Gary Clark, Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gary Clark Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Gary Clark Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply