Talk:Gary Drescher

Untitled

Is this the Drescher of Drescher and the Toaster? 67.207.113.90 (talk) 21:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Dominant

Is the Copenhagen interpretation really dominant? If so, where? It may well be that Copenhagen is what laypeople are most exposed to, but it's my impression that Everett-Wheeler is what's taught even at the undergraduate physics level, not necessarily because it's being endorsed as the One True Interpretation so much as being a really useful way to look at things so that you can solve quantitative problems. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 00:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many_worlds_interpretation#Reception doesn't indicate that MWI is the #1 popular interpretation. --Gwern (contribs) 21:26 5 August 2012 (GMT)

very poor biography

gary was as a student a figure at mit's artificial intelligence center, a close friend of dano hillis and margaret minsky, daughter of marvin, called the *grandfather of artificial intelligence," and an acquaintance of physicist richard fynman. he also worked at hillis's Thinking Machines corp, which corp died from a combination of declining federal funding, intense competition and ego. also, this early truly massively parallel computer proved too awkward to program. all this is very easy to document. 184.74.94.207 (talk)grumpy —Preceding undated comment added 19:12, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

If you could post some links to reliable sources, we could work this information in. I'm StillStanding (24/7) (talk) 02:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gary Drescher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060810172959/http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=10902 to http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=10902

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Remove "author of multiple books on AI" and/or clarify the bibliography situation

As far as I know, there are only two books, and only one specifically about AI -- and I'm a fan so would be excited to find other books. Lukstafi (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)