Talk:Gaseous signaling molecules

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because i am still working on it right now (your reason here) --Roman Bekker (talk) 21:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a technical review journal. It is an encyclopedia (general overviews). The relevant guidelines are WP:SECONDARY. Also be careful not to cite yourself or your colleagues. It's called conflict of interest. Many new editors cite themselves mainly. See WP:COI. That behavior is unacceptable. If you have questions, many editors can offer advice. Happy editing. --Smokefoot (talk) 00:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Where do you see "citing yourself" or "citing colleagues"? Where do you see "conflict of interest"? There in an article is a LOT of secondary sources, which are all PubMed-indexed and authoritative. And I'm NOT a "new editor" - I've been there in Wikipedia for about 10 years. Not always very active though. Roman Bekker (talk) 07:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Authors

Some parts of this article were taken from several other Wikipedia articles, specifically Gasotransmitter, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, hydrogen sulfide, ethylene, sulfur dioxide, ammonia, nitrous oxide, hydrogen, ethylene oxide, methane, carbon suboxide, hydrogen cyanide. The original authors of respective parts of the text can be seen in an edit history of those respective articles.

Some other parts were taken from ru:Сигнальные молекулы газов and then translated into English. The original authors can be seen in an edit history of the Russian article. Roman Bekker (talk) 09:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Yang-cycle.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)