Talk:Gaspard II de Coligny
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editWould it be worth mentioning the death of the Francois de Guise? I seem to recall that there was a view that Henri de Guise's role in St Bartholomew's was at least partly inspired by his view that Coligny was responsible for the death of his father —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.212.0.34 (talk) 19:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problem
edit
This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as that editor has a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of his or her major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:26, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem
edit This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as that editor has a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of his or her major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 12:48, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Date of birth - image shows different date
editThis image of a monument gives 1517 as the date of birth, while the article gives 1519. Why might this be? Would it be worth adding a note to the thumbnail explaining the discrepancy? --134.225.160.102 (talk) 14:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Nice spotting! 1bandsaw (talk) 16:32, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Are we sure he's born in 1519, not 1517?
editCos I was walking past the Louve yesterday and they've got this effing great statue of him on Rue Rivoli saying in big gold digits that he was born in 1517.
I think the statue was late C19th. {Think 3e Republic secularism} Maybe they confused his birth with the Reformation.
But the French don't normally get their statue details wrong. Ganpati23 (talk) 07:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)