This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer Note
editThis organization appears to be notable independently from its founder. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Question
editThere is a tag on this draft saying that it is not ready for mainspace. However, it has recently been submitted for AFC review. It is my judgment that it is ready for mainspace, and I am prepared to accept it, except that there is the tag on it. Is there any reason why I should not remove the tag and proceed to accept the draft? Robert McClenon (talk) 23:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- That's a default Art+Feminism template so I don't interpret it as an active tag. I've moved the article over my old redirect. @Cpfffr, since your user page states an affiliation with Black Mountain, is there any additional conflict of interest you'd like to declare on this talk page about your relationship to this topic? By the way, I edit in the Paul Goodman space so let me know if I can offer anything in that department. :) Happy New Year! czar 01:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, User:Czar - So the template means that it isn't ready for mainspace until it is ready for mainspace. Okay. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know their process but {{Preloaddraft submit}} ostensibly says that so that someone from the edit-a-thon would review submissions rather than flooding mainspace. In any event, doesn't look like that happened in this case. But I left the AfC tag in case there was some formal procedure for "accepting" the draft, since you did review it. czar 02:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, User:Czar - So the template means that it isn't ready for mainspace until it is ready for mainspace. Okay. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)