Talk:Gay's the Word (bookshop)

References and Footnotes

I have created separate sections for Footnotes from the text and References as a bibliography in line with Wikipedia:FN#Style_recommendations. Ashley VH (talk) 08:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Operation Tiger reference

I thought it might be useful to park here the text from the Guardian June 28, 1986 when the criminal charges were dropped (with the intent of using it in the wikipage during the next tidy-up as an additional published source):

Customs drop gay bookshop charges / Case against Gay's the Word shop in London

Nicholas De Jongh, Arts Correspondent

Customs and Excise has dropped all criminal charges against the London bookshop Gay's the Word, and nine of its directors and employees more than two years after officers seized 142 titles in a controversial raid on the premises.

The move follows a judgment in the European Court that a section of a British Act of Parliament is not lawful under the Treaty of Rome.

The abandonment of the prosecution threatens to result in a series of test cases in the civil courts and pressure in the Commons for changes in obscene publications legislation. The directors of the bookshop had been committed for trial at the Old Bailey on charges of conspiring to evade the prohibition on the importation of indecent or obscene articles under the Customs Consolidation Act, 1876. The case was expected to be heard in four months' time. Several of the titles involved had already been published in Britain. They included Querelle, by Jean Genet, and poetry and novels by Allen Ginsberg, Edmund White, Tennessee Williams and Kate Millet.

Yesterday, however, a Customs and Excise spokesman said that a recent European Court judgment in the case of Conegate Ltd, involving inflatable sex dolls, had ruled that the prohibition of importation from the EEC to Britain of indecent or obscene articles under the Customs Consolidation Act was not lawful under Article 36 of the Treaty of Rome, unless the domestic manufacture of and trade in those articles was also prohibited.

The judgment applies to artefacts and publications. It strikes to the heart of British law under which the tests of indecency and obscenity governing imported material are different from those applied to publications produced inside the United Kingdom.

The spokesman said that the Customs and Excise commissioners had taken the view that 'though the court judgment related only to material imported from other EEC countries it would be inequitable and impracticable not to apply the same standards to all imports.' He said the Customs recognised that the legal climate had changed and the bookshop case would be dropped.

Fifty of the 69 titles still held are to be returned to Gay's the Word and 19 others, which are still considered by Customs and Excise to be obscene, are to be returned to the firm in the USA from which they were imported.

Ms Marie Staunton, legal officer of the National Council for Civil Liberties, which took up the case, said yesterday: 'Customs believe that these books offend against the Obscene Publications Act tests. We disagree and we will import them again one by one, after telling Customs, and test each one in civil action in a magistrates' court.

A spokesman for Defend Gay's the Word Campaign which had raised more than pounds 53,000 for the defence, said it would now campaign to bring Customs rules in relation to publications into line with domestic legislation. The Labour MP, Mr Chris Smith, is to table a 10-minute rule bill to attempt this in the Commons next Wednesday.

—Ashleyvh (talk) 12:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Style of article

What is this piece? It reads like an informal Time-Out for the bookstore. It needs to be trimmed by 2/3 and wikified. Zezen (talk) 15:11, 11 October 2015 (UTC)