This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I removed the PROD because the rationale questioned verifiability of the topic; however the information as such seems factually correct, if badly written. See this source in Italian [1]. I do not want to judge about notability here - there are a number of Google hits for this; most are from blogs, but there's also one from USA Today. The notability question might be better discussed in an AfD, or here on the talk page. --B. Wolterding12:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
