Talk:Gefjon/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi. Will start review soon. :) Kaguya-chan (talk) 16:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   There seems to have been a recent edit war over the lead :(

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Kaguya-chan (talk) 16:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Because the edit war is/was over, I'm going to pass this article. Good work! Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:31, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Great, thanks for taking the time to check the article over! :bloodofox: (talk) 22:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)