Talk:Gelae donut
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Gelae donut appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 20:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a Gelae donut has large, protruding eyes? Source: "eyes large, rounded, protruding" [[1]]
- Comment: Another hook which is interesting solely because of a pun in the scientific name.
Created by AryKun (talk). Self-nominated at 06:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC).
No article linked and wrong format on the nomination, please read WP:DYK first to understand what a DYK is for and how it is formatted. Thank you. Nyanardsan (talk) 08:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, was in a hurry when I listed this. I actually have gotten four DYK's approved already, I just missed the fact that I didn't format this properly. And for the QPQ, I did review this, but can't figure out where to list it. AryKun (talk) 10:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Hey, @Nyanardsan:, could you look this over one more time? AryKun (talk) 12:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- suggesting an ALT1: theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 17:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the Gelae donut is in the same genus as the Gelae fish, Gelae baen, and Gelae rol?
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Not cited at the end of the sentence per WP:DYK#gen3b - Interesting:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Article is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, neutral and plagiarism-free. The hook interesting (and it also seems a bit AFDy (April Fool's Day, not articles for deletion!) too) but the fact is not cited at the end of the sentence. I prefer ALT0 as the more quirky/funny one. QPQ has been done. Pamzeis (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Added the ref. AryKun (talk) 08:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Good to go. Pamzeis (talk) 14:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
