Talk:Gelman-Rubin statistic
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Smith609 in topic correction?
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
correction?
editAn anonymous editor wrote this in the article:"I believe this formula is incorrect. See pgs 436-437 (Section 1.2: "Monitoring Convergence: The Original Method") for correct formula: http://www2.stat.duke.edu/~scs/Courses/Stat376/Papers/ConvergeDiagnostics/BrooksGelman.pdf " I reverted the edit, and pasted it here in case someone wants to follow up. DoctorMatt (talk) 20:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Vats & Knodsun agree. I've included a link to this source on the main page. My original edit was reverted, but given that this discussion is stale here, I suggest that any editor wishing to improve the article retains the citation to Vats & Knudson and provides appropriate context. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 09:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)