Talk:Gender, Institutions and Development Database
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |
New article: GID Database, or GID-DB
editThe gender group at the OECD Development Centre does gender equality work which is described in this article's External Links webpages and their links, gender work which I think can help humankind. So I'm willing to do the work of researching and writing this article to help some WP readers learn about their product, the GID-DB. Their wikigender.org's article on the GID-DB provided a starting point, but did not give its readers much of a feel for the 12 social institutions, and did not even mention the broader-OECD-datasets context within which the GID-DB is presented to us humans. I mentioned that context, enough to hopefully allow the reader to just accept it and not worry about it..... For7thGen (talk) 01:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gender, Institutions and Development Database. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111111092407/http://www.beta.undp.org/undp/en/home.html to http://www.beta.undp.org/undp/en/home.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)