Talk:Gender and webcomics

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

source attribution

edit

Is there a reason the chart in the article is sourced to Comics Alliance when the writer makes it clear that she pulled her information from this write up on SKTCHD? Argento Surfer (talk) 21:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Argento Surfer: I suppose I did it that way because Comics Alliance is the reliable source. Therefore, we use their judgment for our inclusion of Harper's data. ~Mable (chat) 21:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
I understand why you'd want to go with a tertiary source over a primary one in general, but it seems like a misrepresentation when the chart shown isn't really from Comics Alliance. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
I could also place two citations there: one to the primary source and one to the secondary source. I'm mostly just worried about the information being removed because the primary source is not a reliable one. ~Mable (chat) 22:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
I'd be surprised if anyone challenged Harper's work as unreliable, but I see your point. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gender and webcomics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply