Talk:Gene Amondson/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 19:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC) Hi, I am reviewing this article. I find it a very nice article, quite well done. I did a little copy editing, mostly removing spaces and such.

• One question, I am not clear about the copy right status of of the two photos that have OTRS tickets.
• Also, there are a couple of links that need disambiguation.[1]

Xtzou (Talk) 19:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. I believe I have fixed all the disambiguation links above. As for the photos, I received them from Amondson's son and was given permission to use them on wikipedia (which is why I added them to the article), but the OTRS people found that his permission was not explicit enough to use on commons. I will contact him and try to get this worked out. In the meantime, I'll comment out the images. I am certain this will be cleared up shortly.--William S. Saturn (talk) 23:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Xtzou (Talk) 12:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: Concisely and clearly written

   B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MOS

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources: Reliable sources

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects: Sets the context

   B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 12:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)