Talk:General Butt Naked/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 20:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

I'll take a look at reviewing this article. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 20:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks for taking a crack at this, amigo. If we manage to complete this today, it will be the second article I raise to GA status within a day. Looking forward to your comments, señor. Dabberoni15 (talk) 20:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Images

• No copyright issues with the image of Samuel Doe.
• Is there no free image of Blahyi on Wikimedia Commons? Or one that can be used under fair use?
  • To the extent of my knowledge, there is no image of Blahyi on Wikimedia Commons that I've found. I'm sure there could possibly be an image of him online which could be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and then put in the article, however I am unfamiliar with how to do so. Do you think the article seriously needs a photo of Blahyi? If so, I will try to upload an image of Blahyi.
    • I don't think it's necessary, but it would improve the article. So as it is, it should be good.

MoS, structure, coverage, and grammar

Lead

• It doesn't seem that Blahyi held any office, so I would recommend changing the infobox to Template:Infobox military person or Template:Infobox person with the military person infobox embedded in.
  • Sorry, I'm not very familiar with Wikipedia (unfortunately). How would I do the latter?
    • In the infobox person template, go to where it says "| module = ", and there, add the template for military person with "| child = yes" inside of its code. (I think its child at least, if not, try it with "embed" or "embedded").
      • Done
        • I made a slight change, but the article should be good now.
• I've gone ahead and fixed the inconsistent date in the infobox from dmy to mdy.
  • Thanks
• At "also known by his nom de guerre" maybe change it to "better known by his nom de guerre"
  • Done
• At "staged a coup d'état in 1980" mention who Doe deposed.
  • Reworded

Early life

• "officer Samuel Doe" → "Master Sergeant Samuel Doe"
  • Done

Military career

• At "Blayhi stated that", add a colon to the end.
  • Done
• At "the Devil informed him "that he would become a great warrior" I would move the quotation mark to before "a great warrior" as it looks and sounds a bit odd how it is now. This shouldn't affect the meaning of the sentence, though.
  • Done
• Same as above with "captured a town".
  • Done

Religious conversion

• NGO should be spelt out as "non-governmental organization"
  • Done
• What is Spoon Talk? It should half a brief description.
  • Reworded to say what it is instead of a red link to an obscure Liberia talk show, what do you think now?
    • Looks good. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 23:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
• Remove link to Bojan Jancic, as it seems unlikely a page will be created.
  • Done

In popular culture

• Remove link to Kirk Honeycutt, for same reason as above.
  • Done

References

• I moved Websites and Books to a fourth level header, as right now Bibliography technically is empty
  • Thanks

Overall

• No war edits ongoing on the page.
• Sources are reliable.
• Article is well referenced.
• Article follows a neutral point of view.
• Categories are good.
• Good coverage of the topic.
• Well written, no misspellings which I saw.

Very good job. Just a little minor edits to the article and I'll give it a pass for good article. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 22:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

• Also, I'll be occupied between 23:15 to 0:30 UTC, so apologizes if I can't get to this between then.
  • I think I've addressed all your concerns, PizzaKing13. Please respond when you can! :) Dabberoni15 (talk) 23:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

@Dabberoni15: The article meets the Good Article criteria, and I have passed this article. Congratulations on getting two articles listed as good articles in a single day! PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 23:50, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.