Talk:American steamship General Lyon (1864)

(Redirected from Talk:General Lyon (steamboat))
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Ceyockey in topic Requested move 21 April 2021

Requested move 21 April 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to American steamship ''General Lyon'' (1864). The consensus was forming around ''General Lyon'' (steam*, 1864), using either steamboat or steamship. However, as pointed out a) this was oceangoing (suggesting 'ship' should be used) and b) the title should abide by Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships)#Ships from navies without ship prefixes. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:11, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply



General Lyon (steamboat)General Lyon (transport)USS General Lyon (1860) was also a steamboat, and I don't see how this can claim primary topic. Hog Farm Talk 04:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

To your second point, see here; construction began in late 1863, with the agreement already in place that the Army would charter it upon launch (which happened in March 1864.) 162 etc. (talk) 20:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
In that case, I would support General Lyon (steamship, 1864). Still no indication it ever used the SS prefix. And it was a sea-going ship rather than a riverboat. The title of the other one is fine. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
If we leave out "SS" (which, after researching this a bit, seems like a good idea) we need to follow WP:NCS standard for ships without ship prefixes. In this case, American steamship General Lyon (1864). 162 etc. (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
See WP:NCS for the convention regarding these article titles, your suggestions are nonstandard. 162 etc. (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.