Talk:General Motors Hy-wire

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Josh-Levin@ieee.org in topic Expired link

picture

edit

it needs a picture. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.17.197.169 (talkcontribs) 02:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

done... I almost forgot I had taken these... - Adolphus79 04:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

-I think that the concept has changed, I may be wrong, but I remember looking up on an image search the hy-wire and it looked nothing like that

That picture is the GM AUTOnomy concept, a predecessor to the Hy-wire. The Hy-wire resembles a more conventional sedan.Brecchie (talk) 20:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

HowStuffWorks has a gallery of Hy-wire pictures. They are copyrighted, but fair-use is better than nothing. -Ian01 (talk) 03:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

power

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was support for move. As for hyphenation, a Google search to see which one is more common shows the original, hyphenated name appears to be far more common (hy-wire vs. hywire).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit

Page was renamed in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=General_Motors_Autonomy&direction=next&oldid=260090797, without any discussion that I can see, apart from a suggestion that an image was incorrect. The Autonomy and Hywire were both concept cars, that could have their shell replaced and so have different looks, so it is hard to judge from photos. The vast majority of references on the web refer to the vehicle as the GM Hywire. Furthermore, if the page is going to be renamed, the rest of the article should be updated to reflect that change... it still refers exclusively to the Hywire and makes no mention of the Autonomy. --Feyrauth (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agree I just clicked on this article from the Volt article and was totally confused as to why the article text doesn't match the title in any shape, way or form. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.12.246.125 (talk) 20:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
The above comment was made by me, forgetting to log in. oops. VJ (talk) 20:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Rename back to HyWire the Hywire was better known Greglocock (talk) 00:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Question. It was originally General Motors Hy-wire.[1] Should it be Hy-wire or Hywire? 199.125.109.52 (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

The link at Video of Hy-wire in operation by Top Gear might be dead. Josh-Levin@ieee.org (talk) 08:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply