Talk:General National Congress

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Paine Ellsworth in topic Orphaned references in General National Congress

Request merge

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to Merge. Panam2014 (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi General National Congress (2014) is an original research. Any source it is a 2014 or new GNC. The GNC continued in rebellion. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Agree Charles Essie (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Support EkoGraf (talk) 18:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Comment. General National Congress (2014) has been renamed to National Salvation Government (Libya). Since there has been no activity in this merge request since May 2017, I will remove the merge templates from the articles.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  13:37, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Paine Ellsworth, Charles Essie, and EkoGraf: The request merge was legitimate. I think we have to transfer the sections of the article devoted to the activity of GNC from 2014 to 2016 on this article. --Panam2014 (talk) 23:54, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

There was no intent to deem otherwise, Panam2014 – the merge templates were removed solely because of the length of time this merge discussion has been open with no apparent action and closure. Feel free to either complete this merge as supported by the above consensus, or to reopen this discussion by replacing the merge templates. I'm okay with either choice.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  02:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Agreed: The other article should focus exclusively on the National Salvation Government. Charles Essie (talk) 02:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support: EkoGraf (talk) 08:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Done --Panam2014 (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General National Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC) –  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  01:54, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in General National Congress

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of General National Congress's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "auto":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 22:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Fixed: this was evidently just a typo and should have been named "auto1".  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  17:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Pinging editor Panam2014 to confirm the above, or to correct the reference name as needed.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  17:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge

edit

Hi @Paine Ellsworth, Charles Essie, and EkoGraf: I have merged the two parts. --Panam2014 (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank You. Charles Essie (talk) 23:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. EkoGraf (talk) 07:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Paine Ellsworth, Charles Essie, EkoGraf, Dekimasu, and Pppery: Now, I think we should create an article for the Tobruk-led government. And for the both add the list of the ministers.--Panam2014 (talk) 12:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Sure, and maybe one for the "High Council of Revolution". Charles Essie (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Why was I pinged here? {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 19:00, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply