Clarification by editing

edit

Reading this article has really been a big help to me at understanding how I may retrieve more information from a response function, more specifically the response of the temperature inside my house to outdoor (weather) as well as indoor (e.g. gas heating) influences from measurement data over a long time interval. (If I can discover enough response in the form of slowly decaying exponentials, that would suggest insulating the thermally slow parts of house is worthwhile.)

But I would like to suggest some edits in order to make understanding the flow (not necessarily the details; that might be too much to expect from a Wikipedia article) of the text easier. I am thinking of:

  1. defining  , before it is used;
  2. defining   and explaining how it is obtained, before it is used;
  3. and maybe, if that is not already a detail, explaining why   and   represent the eigenvectors of   and  .Redav (talk) 21:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why not use names and for matrices containing elements called ?

edit

The article uses notation   and   for matrices containing  . For ease of reading, I propose using   and   instead.Redav (talk) 20:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply