Talk:Genetic redundancy
Latest comment: 10 months ago by FaviFake in topic page redundancy (pun intended)
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • Gene redundancy Because this page is not heavily watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Gene redundancy Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
 | The content of the Genetic redundancy page was merged into Gene_redundancy on 19 January 2026. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
page redundancy (pun intended)
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
there is another page called gene redundancy which treats the same topic, I guess they should be merged, right?
Martombo —Preceding undated comment added 11:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yep. Note I just re-deleted a big chunk of this article as it was based on a creationist source and probably a copyright violation – see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Genetics/Archive_2#Genetic_redundancy_contains_some_material_from_Creation.com_.28copyvio.29. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 11:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- They are duplicates, but somewhere it would be nice if there were a page about redundant biochemical pathways (redundant metabolic pathways), relating to metabolic networks. The original version of this page seemed to be heading in that direction, but it never really got off the ground. There are interesting implications of genetic redundancy that are not just gene-for-gene. How about reverting way back. Possible sources include:
- A See also section should include Copy-number variation. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 19:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Confusing second paragraph
[edit]The second paragraph is confusing and seems to contradict itself. At the start it says that gene duplications are the main source of genetic redundancy and then a few sentences in, it contradicts this. Could this be clarified? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seleukos1209 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)