Talk:Genetics in fiction
 | Genetics in fiction has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 21, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editHow do the genetics in these works compare to real world applications of genetics? Is it realistic? EdwardJS97 (talk) 05:39, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Unbelievable. Replaced image. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
.jpg){kind=link}
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Aaaargh. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Mutated Daleks, apparently
editAn IP is trying to add some uncited material on Daleks, on the grounds that their backstory includes mutation. This does seem a very weak and tangential connection to the article, but if we were to include something on that here, it would have to be cited to a Reliable Source; at the moment it certainly looks like purest Original Research. The addition of a WP:PRIMARY source for part of the material does little to improve matters, though it does show willingness to listen, which is appreciated. A reliable secondary source (not connected to the BBC or the production) is required, and to be honest that source needs to discuss the mutation system involved - that would seem unlikely as the backstory doesn't seem to say anything about the fictional biology involved. I still think this is somewhere between trivia and original research. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Agree that this is not a notable inclusion to include here. AIRcorn (talk) 19:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Right, let's get rid of it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Fiction VS Science Fiction
editThere is a specifically named type of fiction writing called science fiction, what - why - how is this named the plain description "fiction"? --Mark v1.0 (talk) 19:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Well, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein for instance was written just as "fiction", a novel, and it is certainly within this article's scope. The distinction you make may now be common but it's to a considerable extent artificial (when is something fantasy instead of "science fiction", etc). The basic point however is that the intractable nomenclature doesn't much matter for this topic, which is the appearance of genetics in fictional narratives. The article has existed quietly for a good while now, and has passed formal review. Let's leave it alone. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:24, 23 June 2021 (UTC)