This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 19, 2012, November 19, 2015, November 19, 2018, November 19, 2019, and November 19, 2023. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geneva Summit (1985). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111130071629/http://www.charlierose.com:80/view/interview/9058 to http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/9058
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Impact
editI doubt I'll ever get around to contributing to this, but we really need some bipartisan/nonpartisan analysis of the impact of this meeting. The acknowledgement that nuclear war was not an outcome between the two is worth discussing alone, the long-term efficacy of this meeting in ending the Cold War is likely is subject to considerable debate. --Simtropolitan (talk) 17:38, 13 June 2019 (UTC)